This Is Utterly Inappropriate.
Mar 22If this is inappropriate,
http://youtu.be/aP74qJBWsKY
then this is inappropriate, too
http://youtu.be/TpaQYSd75Ak
I do not know the stupid details of this certainly stupid TV transmission. What I see:
1) tattooed people;
2) people making the horns
3) A nun making the horns
4) Other nuns behaving like teenies considered stupid by her own classmates.
5) A fully secular song, that no amount of “but she means to give everything to God” can hide. With this mentality, Sister could have sung “like a virgin”.
6) “Ho un dono, ve lo dono”, my foot. You're a nun, Sister. You are supposed to spend your time praying and helping, not jumping around like you're on cocaine.
7) “Non capisco piu' niente”, says Raffaella Carra', “I can't understand anything anymore”. She obviously can't understand (I mean, she says so) how a nun can behave in that way. She is not the only one.
Dear Mundabor,
Things may not be quite how you have perceived and reacted to. Let me respond to your numbered points:
1) tatooed peopleI too have a bit of a problem with that, especially considering Lev. 19:28.
2) people making the hornsI too am a bit concerned when I see that, and that one judge definitely made the sign of the horns - at least it seemed that way to me, an American. I'm not sure what that may mean in the Italian culture. Still, it bothers me.
3) A nun making the hornsWell, that would bother me, but let's look at the possible "horns" made by Suor Cristina Scuccia:
First one:
Second one:
Well, not quite again... in Sign Language, that's the sign for "I love you."
So, not necessarily "the horns" as you say, Mundabor.
4) Other nuns behaving like teenies considered stupid by her own classmates.They were excited for how well their sister was performing. Consider the fact that not all nuns are cloistered in convents.
5) A fully secular song, that no amount of “but she means to give everything to God” can hide. With this mentality, Sister could have sung “like a virgin”.Well, I beg to differ. There's a HUGE difference between expressing one's love for "no one but you" (Jesus) and singing "like a virgin, being touched for the very first time." Just because a song is secular that does not make it blatantly sexual - as Madonna's (the very name she chose for her stage name is offensive to me based upon what she sang, how she dressed, etc.) "Like a Virgin."
6) “Ho un dono, ve lo dono”, my foot. You're a nun, Sister. You are supposed to spend your time praying and helping, not jumping around like you're on cocaine.And again, not all nuns are cloistered in convents or monasteries. Now, if you have evidence that she belongs to a cloister - THEN you have a better argument. There IS diversity in vocations.
7) “Non capisco piu' niente”, says Raffaella Carra', “I can't understand anything anymore”. She obviously can't understand (I mean, she says so) how a nun can behave in that way. She is not the only one.
In short, I believe you have over-responded to this piece.
Now, how could your response be better worded and not necessarily scandalous (like publicly calling out a nun when you might not have all the facts straight)? How about asking some questions?
1) Why all the tattoos, people? I know they are popular, but they are also contrary to God's Word in Lev. 19:28.
2) Does holding out the pinky and index finger mean the same thing in Italy as it does in the USA? Just curious because we see that as "devil horns."
3) Sister Cristina, could you explain to us what appears to be "devil horns" gestures?
4) I'd leave that one out completely - non-cloistered nuns can be out in public and excited for what one of their sisters is doing.
5) I realize that the song you selected can be directed to Jesus, but it is a secular song sung by Alicia Keys, and there are so many Christian songs to choose from, some of which have even crossed over to the secular charts. Wouldn't your energies and talent be better served if you sang something which did not have such a secular interpretation to it?
6 and 7) Again, I'd leave those out. Unless you have evidence that she belongs to a cloistered convent and is in violation of her vows - such accusations are scandalous and need not be aired in public. Now I repeat, if you have evidence that she does belong to such a convent, or worse, is not a nun at all and is dressed that way as a publicity stunt. That thought crossed my mind too, and if you look at other youtube appearances, her habit is different or she's not even wearing the habit (which it is possible those clips were recorded before she entered the vocation).
The above being said, I did a little more research myself and found this article, which expresses many of the same thoughts I had in watching the video.
http://guardianlv.com/2014/03/sister-cristina-singing-evangelism-of-rapper-j-ax-video/
It would seem her order is called to go out and evangelize in the world - and not remain cloistered in a convent somewhere (and that is a good vocation too, for those who are called to it).
I would also bring out that the first judge who turned around, rapper J-Ax, was brought to tears by her form of evangelization - so perhaps she is reaching people for the Lord in ways that might seem strange to you.
In short, Mundabor, I believe you should post an apology and retraction of your article.
Scott Windsor<<<
AKA: CathApol
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep in mind while posting:
1) Please respond ON TOPIC to the article at hand.
2) Posts more than 4 weeks old are set to automatically save new comments for moderation - so your comment may not show up immediately if you're responding to an older post.
3) The "Spam Filter" is on - and randomly messages get caught in that filter. I have no control over which messages get caught in the spam filter and those that do must wait for me to mark them as "not spam." A message caught by the spam filter may show up for a moment, making you think it posted, and then disappear. Do not assume I have deleted your comment, it's probably just the spam filter and it will show up.