Projection

Psychological projection was conceptualized by Sigmund Freud in the 1890s as a defense mechanism in which a person unconsciously rejects his or her own unacceptable attributes by ascribing them to objects or persons in the outside world. For example, a person who is rude may accuse other people of being rude. 

(Sigmund Freud, Case Histories II (PFL 9) p. 132 - qtd. on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection )

Have you ever noticed how some (if not most) Protestant apologists will try to point out divisions within the Catholic Church?  They are attempting to show we're not "one" - even though fundamentally we are.  What is really going on here is a psychological defense mechanism Freud called "projection."  One of the more serious of the flawed characteristics of Protestantism is the fact that they are not "one" as Jesus declares is His desire for us (John 17:21-22).  Rather than face this glaring fault, they "project" this toward Catholicism and attempt to point out every little disagreement they can find - as if to say, "see, they are no better than we are!"  It is as if to justify them being separated from the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church which Jesus Christ Himself built.  Like Luther, et al, they would rather be separated from that One instead of being within it and working to solve perceived problems.

True "reform" happens from the inside, not the outside.  There is no reformation among Protestantism, for they formed new churches and rejected THE Church they left behind.  The true history of any church of Protestantism is no more than 500 years old!  The history of the Church they abandoned is nearly 2000 years old!   Rather than build bridges back to their heritage, they continue to put up walls to reinforce their separation instead of seeking to be One - as Jesus Christ desires (John 17:21-22).

Rather than seek union, many Protestant apologists attempt to justify their separation by pointing out divisions among Catholics.  Think of the logic going on here, or lack thereof.  If there are divisions in Catholicism (which I am not denying there are) then these are scars within the Church which need to be healed.  It is not a valid argument to use comparisons of said divisions to justify being wholly separated from the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.  A stark difference in this comparison is that those divisions "within the Catholic Church" are still WITHIN the Catholic Church and not schismatic separations which are contrary to the will of God.  This "projection" of separation as a justification of their own separation must be truly disappointing to Jesus.

Perhaps next time you see the Protestant apologist preaching a "blueprint for anarchy" or the like, you will be reminded how opposed to God's Will these arguments are and how disappointed God is in them.

Anglicanism is Divided

Anglicanism is Divided The New Hampshire Decision Statement from All Souls Church, Langham Place, London W1 November 2003 We take note of the sectarian action of dissident bishops of the Episcopal Church in the United States, in carrying through a dubious consecration ceremony which will not be regarded as valid in most Anglican provinces across the world. The service of November 2nd 2003 was held in defiance of the statement and appeal against such an action, issued unanimously on October 14th, 2003, by world Anglican primates at Lambeth. For the Presiding Bishop in America - himself a signatory to that statement - then personally to have overseen the ceremony involving Canon Gene Robinson, indicates a demeaning of his fellow primates (including the Archbishop of Canterbury) and a deviousness in Christian leadership that is unworthy of a Shepherd of the flock of Jesus Christ. In planning to consecrate a bishop a divorcee, now in an active homosexual relationship, the Episcopal Church in the United States of America has caved in to prevalent western cultural pressures and reverted to the paganism of the ancient Graeco-Roman world that was vigorously challenged by the early Christian church. In doing so, ECUSA has departed from the boundaries of orthodox Anglicanism, in contempt of the consistent biblical witness to the God-given institution of marriage, and of 2000 years of universal church practice across all Christian traditions. We will fully support British bishops who continue to stand for the biblical norm of the one man/one woman lifelong monogamous relationship that represents marriage - and we thank the overwhelming majority of Anglican leaders worldwide who are giving the lead in standards of sexual behaviour. But we also intend to work with Anglican Mainstream and with every network that strengthens local parish churches in the nationwide lead that supremely belongs to them. The result of the controversial service on November 2nd is to be seen not as much as a split in the Anglican Communion, but rather as a stepping away by ECUSA, outside of the world-wide Anglican witness. It is an occasion of tragedy that we are not able to recognise Canon Gene Robinson as a bishop; nor are we able to welcome any further as Anglicans the ministry of those who took part in the service of 2.11.03. ECUSA claims to have taken a step towards 'inclusivity.' The opposite will be the result, in the loss from their membership of a very great number of men and women who are determined to be loyal to the apostolic standards of the Gospel of Christ. It is with immense sorrow that we foresee the reduction of the Episcopal Church in America to what will turn out to be a diminishing single-issue sectarian body. It is for this reason that we extend our deep and prayerful sympathies to those men and women, clergy and lay, in North America, who continue loyally to teach and abide by the Scriptures. We shall give our support to Anglican leadership world-wide in the providing of structures and encouragement for them in their continuing service. We also wish warmly to affirm those sisters and brothers, already in membership with orthodox churches, who - while experiencing same-sex desires and feelings - nevertheless battle with the rest of us, in repentance and faith, for a lifestyle that affirms marriage and celibacy as the two given norms for sexual expression. There is room for every kind of background and past sinful experience among members of Christ's flock as we learn the way of repentance and renewed lives, for Such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God (I Corinthians 6:11) This is true inclusivity. Richard Bewes Rector of All Souls Church London W1B 3DA United Kingdom http://www.anglican-mainstream.net/news72.htm So, the actions of the Anglicans in the United States in consecrating a divorced man, now actively participating in an openly homosexual relationship, has begun an official divide in the Anglican community. This division is seen by some as a "positive." 11/25/03: A Positive Statement from the Anglicans In the midst of apostasy, it's nice to see someone standing for truth. Click here <links to article above> for a positive statement from the Anglicans. http://www.aomin.org Is it just me, or does this division among Christians sound like something that should be praised as a positive? Perhaps this embracing of division is something some groups of Protestants just feel some sort of kinship among a dividing community.   Addendum, 3/1/2020: I happen to agree with the underlying sentiment from aomin.org - that being that homosexuality is not something any Christian church should embrace. Certainly, embrace homosexuals and help guide them to better choices. The fact remains that homosexuality, the act of such, not merely the tendencies or even desire thereof, is an abomination to God who clearly in His Word, several times, has made this truth known. The sad part is that there became another schism within the schism of Anglicanism over this. It is the prayer of this writer that there be an acknowledgement of the truth and full unity among Christians be restored to the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.