In St Paul’s letter to the
Galatians we find Paul mentions that Jesus had a brother by the name of
James. Does this mean that Jesus’ mother
did not remain a virgin after His birth, did Jesus have blood-related
siblings? Let’s answer that question.
In Aramaic or Hebrew, there is no
separate word for cousin. Therefore, the
word brother was used for cousins as well as other close members of the family.
As an example we find that in Gen 14:14 Lot is
called Abraham’s brother although we know him to be his nephew. In the jewish custom we find that the word
brother has a broader use such as people joined in a cause to refer to them as
kinsmen (ex: 42 bretheren of King Achaziah (2 Kings 10:13-14)). Or to describe a friend as in 1 Kings 9:13,
20:32 and 2 Sam 1:26. In Amos 1:9 the
word is used to describe an ally.
Therefore, when we come up to
verses which speak of the bretheren (or brothers) of Jesus we can correctly
assume that His brothers are in effect close friends, fellow believers or even
fellow citizens of His native town Nazareth
I believe the difficulty comes when
we find the verses that seem to specify brothers by name such as verses Mark
6:3 and Matt 13:55. Both these verses
seem to be relating the same incident.
Matt 13:55 “Is not this the carpenter’s son? Is not his mother called Mary, and his
brethren James, and Joseph, and Simon, and Jude?” This verse seems to suggest that Mary had
other children by the name James, and Jude.
But if you look closely the author did not call these men Mary’s sons,
this writer separated them from Mary and in doing so introduced the idea that
these men were not Jesus’ biological brothers.
We find elsewhere in Matthew that Mary was the mother of James and
Joseph but these men’s father was Zebedee.
You will see what I mean when you read Matt 27:56 which states: “Among
whom was Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of James and Joseph and the mother
of the sons of Zebedee.” With this we
find that at least James and Joseph (or Jose, its English equivalent) are the
sons of Zebedee (Cleophas) and another Mary.
Therefore, we find that James and Joseph are not the biological brothers
of Jesus. The only reason to be called
the bretheren of Jesus would be because they were childhood friends. We can extrapolate that conclusion by
studying John 19:25 which states: “Now there stood by the cross of Jesus, his
mother and his mother’s sister, Mary of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene”. We find that Mary, the mother of Jesus, had a
‘sister’ named Mary and more than likely these two were not siblings but were
very close.
About Simon
nothing certain can be stated. Out of
the four men grouped together and named in Matt 13:55, we find three of them
are definitely not the biological sons of Mary, Mother of Jesus. Since these men were grouped together and two
out of the four are not His brothers, we can safely and accurately say that the
other two are not Jesus’ brother since to be as such Simon and Jude would have
been introduced in a manner reflective of that fact. At the very least Simon
and Jude would have been described in a different way from the other two. All agree that if Joseph and James are not
brothers of the Savior, the others are not.
To conclude, Mary was a virgin
before the conception of Christ, during her pregnancy and after our Lord’s
birth up to her last day on earth.
God Bless
Nathan
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep in mind while posting:
1) Please respond ON TOPIC to the article at hand.
2) Posts more than 4 weeks old are set to automatically save new comments for moderation - so your comment may not show up immediately if you're responding to an older post.
3) The "Spam Filter" is on - and randomly messages get caught in that filter. I have no control over which messages get caught in the spam filter and those that do must wait for me to mark them as "not spam." A message caught by the spam filter may show up for a moment, making you think it posted, and then disappear. Do not assume I have deleted your comment, it's probably just the spam filter and it will show up.