We are to be ready for those times that we will be in a
position to defend the Truth. Here is an
exchange I recently had online. His
words in italics, mine in bold as well as interspersed within his response. It all started when my friend posted the picture you see at the top of this
leaflet with the caption: “Homosexuality is unnatural? Not according to nature.” I commented that the underlying premise was
false. That is, just because you see a
certain behavior in nature doesn’t mean that the behavior is morally ok to
engage in. For example we find that sometimes lions kill rival's lioncubs. He answers back this way…
Oh[ Nathan]! Loving
another consenting adult who happens to be of the same sex is not morally
wrong. What IS though is rape, murder, pedophilia, incest, child porn, human
trafficking and other very criminal stuff, punishable by law. Homosexuality is
NOT punishable by law. It is natural. So saying that it is morally wrong is
promoting homophobic slurs and prejudice. It incites criminal activity against
another person who is minding his own business, living his life in a most
normal way... loving another person... body and mind, as long as it is with
consent.
A 60-year-old man
dating a 20-year-old woman... is it morally wrong? NO. Do I find it repulsive?
Yes to some extent. Does it mean they shouldn't have the same rights as any
other "normal" couple to get married, have/adopt children and have
the exact same rights and privileges as any other married couple. ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!!
This should also be applied to any same-sex couple wanting to marry and
have/adopt children. No one should lose their jobs for their sexual
orientation. No one should be banned from living anywhere for that either. No
one should be discriminated for it in any way as long as it is with consenting
adults.
Here’s my underlined answer interspersed within his original
post. His words in italics:
Oh [Nathan]! Loving
another consenting adult who happens to be of the same sex is not morally
wrong.
Loving another is never wrong whether he is of the same
sex as you ro not. But the behavior between
two lovers of the same sex is always wrong and you simply saying the contrary
doesn’t make it true.
What IS [morally
wrong] though is rape, murder, pedophilia, incest, child porn, human
trafficking and other very criminal stuff, punishable by law. Homosexuality is
NOT punishable by law. It is natural.
Whether some things are lawful does not determine what is moral. For
example, is it morally ok to have extra marital affairs? Adultery is not
punishable by law so by your standard it is morally ok. The laws of man can be
moral laws but only when they are in line with natural law.
So saying that it is morally wrong is
promoting homophobic slurs and prejudice. It incites criminal activity against
another person who is minding his own business, living his life in a most
normal way... loving another person... body and mind, as long as it is with
consent.
Just because I don’t agree with the lifestyle and me
saying so does not mean that I’m inciting criminal activity. One cannot
logically go from me disagreeing with something to automatically mean that I’m
inciting criminal activity. If that were the case then the government could
prosecute me for disagreeing with anyone else on any given issue. That means that even defense attorneys could
be prosecuted for inciting criminal activity because they are defending those
who acted against the law. There is no logic in your statement, one does not
follow the other.
If there is nothing wrong as long as it is with consent
then what is wrong with a father and daughter being intimate with each other?
Even if they are of legal age and both consent, is it still morally ok? By your
standard it would be.
A 60-year-old man
dating a 20-year-old woman... is it morally wrong? NO. Do I find it repulsive?
Yes to some extent. Does it mean they shouldn't have the same rights as any
other "normal" couple to get married, have/adopt children and have
the exact same rights and privileges as any other married couple. ABSOLUTELY
NOT!!!!
Why are you bringing up all these different things? We
were talking about the false premise that because you see a certain behavior in
nature then it must be morally ok. And now you bring up the subject of
marriage? For the record, I agree with the point you made in the above
paragraph.
This should also be applied to any same-sex
couple wanting to marry and have/adopt children. No one should lose their jobs
for their sexual orientation. No one should be banned from living anywhere for
that either. No one should be discriminated for it in any way as long as it is
with consenting adults.
I agree that no one should be unjustly discriminated
against. Why are you talking about marriage anyway? The subject was that just
because you see a certain behavior in the animal world doesn't mean that it is
ok to do.
To come back to my original point. Just because you see a certain behavior in
the animal world does NOT mean that the behavior is morally acceptable.
God Bless
Nathan
I would add, just because one can find an anecdotal photo of two male lions being friendly (they could be brothers!) does not equate to them acting out sexually.
ReplyDeleteStill, even IF there were acting out sexually, it would not be "natural" for "nature" would have them be sexual as male and female so as to produce offspring. In a "nature" of homosexuality, the species would cease to exist. Point being, if two male lions were being "sexual" with each other, that would not be a "natural act."
Agreed!! thanks for the additional comment.
ReplyDelete