Bishop Olmsted (who happens to be my bishop too) has spoken out and has removed the "Catholic" status from St. Joseph's Hospital in Phoenix, Arizona. He did this because an abortion was performed there to "save the life of the mother."
Responding to someone else in the "blogosphere" he responds:
Now, let us examine what took place...
The case involes a woman with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) - (medical description linked here). This disease is treatable, even among pregnant women (see medical article here) however it is risky. The point of Bishop Olmsted is that it is never permitted in the Catholic Church to perform a direct abortion as a means of treating some other symptom or disease. For example, treating a uterus diseased by cancer involving radiation therapy would also end up terminating a pregnancy - but it was the treatment of the diseased uterus which had the unintended consequence of aborting the baby. In the case at St. Joseph's Hospital the ethics committee, which included a Catholic nun, Sister McBride, made the decision to abort the child - even though there's really no correlation between the child and PAH. Yes, continuing the pregnancy complicates the treatment of PAH and would have been quite risky for the mother. This, in turn, put the child at risk too - but to kill the child because the mother's life was in danger? This is not a moral option for a Catholic to consider. The decision of the committee was that to continue the pregnancy would have put the mother's life at imminent risk, but there comes a point when we must yield to the Lord's Will be done in our lives.
One of the issues involved here was that Bp. Olmsted's office was not consulted prior to the abortion decision and/or the abortion itself. Sister McBride could have yielded to her bishop here and allowed him to make the decision and take the heat for it - why did she act so autonomously?
Another thing the "blogosphere" must consider - we weren't sitting in on those meetings of the ethics committee. We don't sit in Bishop Olmsted's seat. We're basically a bunch of arm-chair quarterbacks and as such we should allow those in authority to do their jobs. Was Sister McBride right to endorse this abortion? Bishop Olmsted has firmly stated she was not and has backed his position with the position of the Catholic Church on abortion. It simply cannot be permitted in a "Catholic" institution.
Lets allow Sister McBride seek reconciliation with the Catholic Church privately. This need not be continually aired, especially by Catholics. To do so can be considered scandalous, which in itself is sinful.
In JMJ,
Scott<<<
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Feast of the Assumption
The Feast of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary - another example of "not-so-ordinary" days! These are COUNTING days - and...
-
This is a continuing discussion from http://cathapol.blogspot.com/2010/01/pope-working-toward-unity-with-eo.html >> sw: "Um, t...
-
Is Sola Scriptura Self Refuting? So goes the title of an article by Steve Hays on Triablogue. The real problem with defining sola scrip...
-
In a recent post from Alan/Rhology on Beggars All , he said: >> sw: So you're confirming (again) that your local >> churc...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep in mind while posting:
1) Please respond ON TOPIC to the article at hand.
2) Posts more than 4 weeks old are set to automatically save new comments for moderation - so your comment may not show up immediately if you're responding to an older post.
3) The "Spam Filter" is on - and randomly messages get caught in that filter. I have no control over which messages get caught in the spam filter and those that do must wait for me to mark them as "not spam." A message caught by the spam filter may show up for a moment, making you think it posted, and then disappear. Do not assume I have deleted your comment, it's probably just the spam filter and it will show up.